sabotage?

May. 16th, 2007 10:23 am
sab123: (Default)
[personal profile] sab123
I've found an interesting code line in Xorg 7.2. It screws up the handling of EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK, and it's enabled only for SVR4 on i386 but not Solaris. Looked like someone has left a piece of debugging code in but the more I think about it the more it looks like an anti-SCO sabotage. I mean, what would be any good reson to put this code in? And who else is SVR4 on i386 and not Solaris?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 151617
1819202122 23 24
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 10:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios